“I can hug her with my eyes”
Virtualization of affection in connected transnational families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880003221Keywords:
virtual copresence, smartphone, e-families , Spain, EcuadorAbstract
This paper explores how the accessibility to and appropriation of information and communication technologies (ICT) has enabled a group of Ecuadorian transnational families to virtualize their expressions of affection. A thematic analysis was applied to examine 41 interviews with a) Ecuadorian migrants who live in Spain, b) relatives of migrants who remain in Ecuador, and c) migrants who have returned to Ecuador while some of their family members remain in Spain. The findings suggest that ICT allows them to adopt strategies to function as connected transnational families because the connectivity that accompanies migrants in the destination country (Spain) shifts to families in the country of origin (Ecuador), thus establishing more symmetric communicational exchanges. Furthermore, migrants who have returned to Ecuador use ICT to sustain the relational continuity of affection with the members of their families in both places.
References
ACEDERA, Kristel; YEOH, Brenda. When care is near and far: Care triangles and the mediated spaces of mobile phones among Filipino transnational families. Geoforum, v. 121, n. 2, p. 181–191, 2021. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.02.021.
AHLIN, Tanja. Frequent callers: “Good care” with ICTs in Indian transnational families. Medical Anthropology, v. 39, n. 1, p. 69–82, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2018.1532424.
ALFAMA, Eva; BONA, Yann; CALLÉN, Blanca. La virtualización de la afectividad. Athenea Digital, n. 7, p. 1–17, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v1n7.196.
AMBROSINI, Maurizio. Moral economy and deservingness in immigration policies. The case of regularizations in Italy. Ethnicities, v. 23, n. 2, p. 306–330, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968221117544.
BALDASSAR, Loretta. De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks, v. 16, n. 2, 145–163, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12109.
BARROS, Carlos. Connection in Transnational Families. Face-to-Face and Digital Spaces in Portuguese Emigrants. Trends in Psychology, p. 1–20, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-023-00309-4.
BASCH, Linda; GLICK, Nina; BLANC-SZANTON, Cristina. Nations Unbond. Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments and Deterritorialized Nation-States. London: Routledge, 2003.
BELLI, Simone; GIL, Adriana. Llorar delante de una pantalla plana. Emociones compartidas en un locutorio. Barataria, n. 12, p. 137–150, 2011.
BENÍTEZ, José Luis. La comunicación transnacional de las e-familias migrantes. San Salvador: PNUD/UCA, 2011.
BORGES, Marcelo; CANCIAN, Sonia. Reconsidering the migrant letter: from the experience of migrants to the language of migrants. History of the Family, v. 21, n. 3, p. 281–290, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2016.1222502.
BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, v. 3, n. 2, p. 77–101, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria. Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1–6, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597.
BRENNAN, Teresa. The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca: Cornell University, 2004.
BRYCESON, Deborah; VUORELA, Ulla. The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg, 2002.
CABALQUINTO, Earvin. ‘They could picture me, or I could picture them’: ‘Displaying’ family life beyond borders through mobile photography. Information, Communication & Society, v. 23, n. 11, p. 1608–1624. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1602663.
CHALÁ-MEJÍA, Priscila; SUQUILLO-GUIJARRO, Ximena; VILLAFUERTE, Iván. Entre tecnología y distancias: remesas emocionales y cultura de vínculos en familias transnacionales ecuatorianas. Migraciones internacionales, v. 13, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33679/rmi.v1i1.2560.
DELEUZE, Giles. Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1988.
DEMIRSU, Ipek. Watching them grow: Intergenerational video-calling among transnational families in the age of smartphones. Global Networks, v. 22, n. 1, p. 119–133, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12334.
DIMINESCU, Dana. The connected migrant: An epistemological manifesto. Social Science Information, v. 47, n. 4, p. 565–579, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018408096447.
EKLUND, Lina; SADOWSKI, Helga. Doing intimate family work through ICTs in the time of networked individualism. Journal of Family Studies, v. 29, n. 2, p. 758–773, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.1984278.
EDWARDS, Rosalind; HOLLAND, Janet. What is qualitative interviewing?. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013.
FEREDAY, Jennifer; MUIR-COCHRANE, Eimear. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, v. 5, n. 1, p. 80–92, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107.
FRANCISCO, Valerie. ‘The Internet Is Magic’: Technology, Intimacy and Transnational Families. Critical Sociology, v. 41, n. 1, p. 173–190, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513484602.
GLICK SCHILLER, Nina; BASCH, Linda; BLANC-SZANTON, Cristina. Towards a definition of transnationalism: Introductory remarks and research questions. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, v. 645, n. 1, p. 1–24, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb33482.x.
HALL, Stuart. Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debate. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, v. 2, n. 2, p. 91–114, 1985.
HERNÁNDEZ-CORDERO, Ana. Cuidar se escribe en femenino: Redes de cuidado en hogares de madres migrantes. Psicoperspectivas, v. 15, n. 3, p. 46–55, 2017. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol15-Issue3-fulltext-784.
HORST, Heather. The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, v. 6, n. 2, p. 143–159, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x.
HUNTER, Alistair. Empowering or impeding return migration? ICT, mobile phones, and older migrants’ communications with home. Global Networks, v. 15. N. 4, p. 485–502, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/glob.12091.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADÍSTICA Y CENSOS. Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación-TIC. Resumen 2023. Available at: <https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/tecnologias-de-la-informacion-y-comunicacion-tic/>. Access: 30.11.2023.
JAJI, Rose. Transnational Migration and Reconfiguration of the Family in Zimbabwe. REMHU, Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, v. 30, n. 66, p. 227–242, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880006613.
JAMIESON, Lynn. Boundaries of intimacy. In MCKIE, Linda; CUNNINGHAM-BURLEY, Sarah; CAMPLING, Jo (eds.). Families in Society: Boundaries and Relationships. Bristol: Policy Press, 2005, p. 189–206.
KEDRA, Joanna. WhatsApp iconology: narratives on in-app photographic practices in (transnational) family communication. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 49, n. 17, p. 4559–4575, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2171975.
LARRINAGA-BIDEGAIN, Nerea; GEMIGNANI, Marco; HERNÁNDEZ-ALBÚJAR, Yolanda. Parents who migrate without their children: Gendered and psychosocial reconfigurations of parenting in transnational families. Journal of Family Theory & Review, p. 1–28, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12577.
LAWTON, Julia, et al. Written versus verbal consent: a qualitative study of stakeholder views of consent procedures used at the time of recruitment into a peripartum trial conducted in an emergency setting. BMC Medical Ethics, v. 18, p. 1–13, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0196-7.
LEIFSEN, Esben; TYMCZUK, Alenzander. Care at a Distance: Ukrainian and Ecuadorian Transnational Parenthood from Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 38, n. 2, p. 219–236, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.646419.
LEMOS, André. Cultura da Mobilidade. Revista Famecos, v. 16, n. 40, p. 28–35, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2009.40.6314.
LÉVY, Pierre. ¿Qué es lo virtual?. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica, 1999.
LOBO, Andréa. Quando os (des) afetos “fazem famílias”. Não-ditos, mentiras e fracassos nas trajetórias de migração em Cabo Verde. REMHU, Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, v. 28 n. 60, p. 205–222, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880006012.
MALTERUD, Kirsti. Theory and interpretation in qualitative studies from general practice: why and how?. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, v. 44, n. 2, p. 120–129, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494815621181.
MASSUMI, Brian. The Autonomy of Affect. Cultural Critique, n. 31, p. 83–109, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354446.
MELELLA, Cecilia. El uso de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación (TIC) por los migrantes sudamericanos en la Argentina y la conformación de redes sociales transnacionales. REMHU, Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, v. 24, n. 46, p. 77–90, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880004606.
NEDELCU, Mihaela. Transnational grandparenting in the digital age: Mediated co-presence and childcare in the case of Romanian migrants in Switzerland and Canada. European Journal of Ageing, v. 14, n. 4, p. 375–383, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10433-017-0436-1.
NEDELCU, Mihaela; WYSS, Maika. ‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: Transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks, v. 16, n. 2, p. 202–218, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/glob.12110.
PORTES, Alejandro; DEWIND, Josh. A cross-Atlantic dialogue: The progress of research and theory in the study of international migration. International Migration Review, v. 38, n. 3, p. 828–851, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00221.x.
QIU, Shuang. Family practices in non-cohabiting intimate relationships in China: doing mobile intimacy, emotion and intergenerational caring practices. Families, Relationships and Societies, v. 11, n. 2, p. 175–191, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/204674321X16468493162777.
REIST, Daniela; RIAÑO, Yvonne. Hablando de aquí y de allá: patrones de comunicación transnacional entre migrantes y sus familiares. In: HERRERA, Geoconda; RAMÍREZ, Jacques (eds.). América Latina migrante: Estado, familias, identidades. Quito: FLACSO- Ministerio de Cultura, 2008, p. 303–323.
RÖSSEL, Jörg; SCHENK, Patrick, PAP, Ilona. Patterns of remittances of intra-European migrants: social relations and moral obligations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 50, n. 10, p. 2529–2550, 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2278413.
SAYAD, Abdelmalek. La doble ausencia. De las ilusiones del emigrado a los padecimientos del inmigrado. Barcelona: Anthropos, [1999] 2010.
THOMAS, William; ZNANIECKI, Florian. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America: A Classic Work in Immigration History. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1996.
USTA, Dilvin Dilara. ‘Are we falling apart?’: Manufacturing familyhood through transnationalism. Journal of Family Studies, v. 29, n. 5, p. 2372–2390, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2023.2174445.
VÁZQUEZ-MAGGIO, Mónica; MEJÍA, Glenda. The Role of Mobile Apps in Transnational Family Connections and Emotions from the Perspective of Mexican Migrants in Australia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, v. 44, n. 3, p. 367–383, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2023.2208527.
VERTOVEC, Steven. Cheap calls: the social glue of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, v. 4, n. 2, p. 219–224, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00088.x.
WARUWU, Barui. Smartphone mothering and mediated family display: Transnational family practices in a polymedia environment among Indonesian mothers in Hong Kong. Mobile Media & Communication, v. 10, n. 1, p. 97–114, 2022. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050157921998408.
WATKINS, Megan. Desiring recognition, accumulating affect. In GREGG, Melissa; SEIGWORTH, Gregory (eds.). The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010, p. 269–285.
WILDING, Raelene. ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, v. 6, n. 2, p. 125–142, 2006, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x.
ZAPATA-MARTÍNEZ, Adriana. Prácticas familiares a distancia en contextos de migración internacional materna y/o paterna. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales, v. 11, n. 1, p. 123–152, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21501/22161201.2978.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Priscila Chalá-Mejía, Ximena Suquillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição BY that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to to self-archive their published manuscripts by posting them in personal blogs, institutional repositories and scientific social media, as well as on their personal social media, as long as the full citation of the original publication is included.
