Reimaging Ethics of Research with Refugees and Migrants

A Collaborative Autoethnography on the Ethics of Research

Autori

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-858525038800033304

Parole chiave:

collaborative autoethnography, decolonizing ethics, refugees, research ethics, vulnerability

Abstract

This article employs a collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to examine how institutional research ethics frameworks shape the experiences of racialized graduate students conducting research with refugees and migrants. Grounded in intersectional feminist, the analysis interrogates how researchers’ positionalities intersect with institutional processes to shape access, participation, and knowledge production. From our analysis, two central themes emerge. First, Colonial Ethics of Care highlights how Western research ethics, oriented toward liability management and institutional protection, often silence marginalized voices and reproduce colonial logics of care. We argue for reframing ethics through relational accountability and community participation that foreground dignity, reciprocity, and justice. Second, The Ethics of Access: Resources and Support demonstrates that access extends beyond regulatory approval, encompassing financial constraints, institutional gatekeeping, and cultural misalignments that shift the burden of ethical responsibility onto individual researchers. Together, these themes underscore that ethical research with marginalized communities requires moving beyond procedural compliance toward practices of solidarity, care, and more resources for researchers.

Biografie autore

  • Meray Sadek , University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

    Meray Sadek is a PhD Candidate in the Department of Sociology and Legal Studies at the University of Waterloo. Her doctoral research examines religious, gendered, and state-driven dicrimination faced by Coptic Orthodox Christians in Saudi Arabia.  Her Master’s at York University, funded by the Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGSM, where her thesis on children born of ISIS's members gained national attention and led to a CBC News interview in 2021.

  • Neela Hassan, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada

    Neela Hassan is a refugee a PhD Candidate in the Department of Sociology and Legal Studies at the University of Waterloo. Her dissertation project examines the intersection of domestic violence and immigration status, with a particular focus on the experiences of women with precarious immigration status. She is a former Fulbright Scholar, through which she earned her MA in Communications and Development Studies at Ohio University.

Riferimenti bibliografici

AYCAN, Zeynep. Paternalism. In: KIM, Uichol; YANG, Kwang-Kuo; HWANG, Kwang-Sung (eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: understanding people in context. Boston: Springer, 2006, p. 445-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20

BLOCK, Karen; WARR, Deborah; GIBBS, Lisa; RIGGS, Elisha. Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 69-87, 2012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes002

BELL, Kirsten. Resisting commensurability: Against informed consent as an anthropological virtue. American Anthropologist, v. 116, p. 511-522, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12122

BLALOCK, Amanda E.; AKEHI, Masaki. Collaborative autoethnography as a pathway for transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, v. 16, n. 2, p. 89-107, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344617715711

BLEDSOE, Caroline H.; SHERIN, Bruce; GALINSKY, Adam G.; HEADLEY, Nathan M.; HEIMER, Carol A.; KJELDGAARD, Erica; UTTAL, David H. Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 101, p. 593-641, 2007.

BOURDIEU, Pierre; WACQUANT, Loïc J. D. An invitation to reflexive sociology Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

CHILISA, Bagele. Indigenous research methodologies 2. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012.

CHANG, Heewon; NGUNJIRI, Faith; HERNANDEZ, Kathy-Ann C. Collaborative autoethnography New York: Routledge, 2016.

CLARK, Tom. Gaining and maintaining access: exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, v. 10, n. 4, p. 485-502, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009358228

GALVEZ, Eliana; MUÑOZ, Susana M. (Re)Imagining anti-colonial notions of ethics in research and practice. Journal of College Student Development, v. 61, n. 6, p. 781-796, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0075

GUILLEMIN, Marilys; GILLAM, Lynn. Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 10, n. 2, p. 261-280, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

GUTA, Adrian; WILSON, Mark G.; FLICKER, Sarah; TRAVERS, Rob; MASON, Cathy; WENYEVE, George; O’CAMPO, Patricia. Are we asking the right questions? A review of Canadian REB practices in relation to community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, v. 5, p. 35-46, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.35

HEIMER, Carol A.; PETTY, Jody. Bureaucratic ethics: IRBs and the legal regulation of human subjects research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 6, p. 601-626, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454

JACOBSEN, Karen; LANDAU, Loren. The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, v. 27, n. 3, p. 185-206, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228

KATZ, Jack. Toward a Natural History of Ethical Censorship. Law & Society Review, v. 41, p. 797-810, 2007.

KHAN, Hafiz Khalid; HUSSAIN, Shahbaz; ALAM, Muhammad. Ethical considerations in social sciences: The dilemmas of informed consent. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 189-195, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss2-2021(189-195)

KOVACH, Margaret. Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.

MACKENZIE, Catriona; MCDOWELL, Christopher; PITTAWAY, Eileen. Beyond “do no harm”: the challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 299-319, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem008

MCILVEEN, Peter. Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, v. 17, n. 2, p. 13-20, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620801700204

PERRY, Kristen H. Ethics, vulnerability, and speakers of other languages: how university IRBs (do not) speak to research involving refugee participants. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 17, p. 899-912, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411425006

SABATI, Sahar. Upholding “colonial unknowing” through the IRB: Reframing institutional research ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 25, n. 9-10, p. 1056-1064, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418787214

SMITH, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. 2. ed. London: Zed Books, 1999.

Pubblicato

2025-12-09

Come citare

Sadek , M., & Hassan, N. (2025). Reimaging Ethics of Research with Refugees and Migrants: A Collaborative Autoethnography on the Ethics of Research. REMHU, Revista Interdisciplinar Da Mobilidade Humana, 33, e332208. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-858525038800033304

Articoli simili

1-10 di 222

Puoi anche Iniziare una ricerca avanzata di similarità per questo articolo.