Reimaging Ethics of Research with Refugees and Migrants
A Collaborative Autoethnography on the Ethics of Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-858525038800033304Palabras clave:
collaborative autoethnography, decolonizing ethics, refugees, research ethicsResumen
This article employs a collaborative autoethnography (CAE) to examine how institutional research ethics frameworks shape the experiences of racialized graduate students conducting research with refugees and migrants. Grounded in intersectional feminist, the analysis interrogates how researchers’ positionalities intersect with institutional processes to shape access, participation, and knowledge production. From our analysis, two central themes emerge. First, Colonial Ethics of Care highlights how Western research ethics, oriented toward liability management and institutional protection, often silence marginalized voices and reproduce colonial logics of care. We argue for reframing ethics through relational accountability and community participation that foreground dignity, reciprocity, and justice. Second, The Ethics of Access: Resources and Support demonstrates that access extends beyond regulatory approval, encompassing financial constraints, institutional gatekeeping, and cultural misalignments that shift the burden of ethical responsibility onto individual researchers. Together, these themes underscore that ethical research with marginalized communities requires moving beyond procedural compliance toward practices of solidarity, care, and more resources for researchers.
Referencias
AYCAN, Zeynep. Paternalism. In: KIM, Uichol; YANG, Kwang-Kuo; HWANG, Kwang-Sung (eds.). Indigenous and cultural psychology: understanding people in context. Boston: Springer, 2006, p. 445-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
BLOCK, Karen; WARR, Deborah; GIBBS, Lisa; RIGGS, Elisha. Addressing ethical and methodological challenges in research with refugee-background young people: reflections from the field. Journal of Refugee Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 69-87, 2012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fes002
BELL, Kirsten. Resisting commensurability: Against informed consent as an anthropological virtue. American Anthropologist, v. 116, p. 511-522, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12122
BLALOCK, Amanda E.; AKEHI, Masaki. Collaborative autoethnography as a pathway for transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, v. 16, n. 2, p. 89-107, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344617715711
BLEDSOE, Caroline H.; SHERIN, Bruce; GALINSKY, Adam G.; HEADLEY, Nathan M.; HEIMER, Carol A.; KJELDGAARD, Erica; UTTAL, David H. Regulating creativity: Research and survival in the IRB iron cage. Northwestern University Law Review, v. 101, p. 593-641, 2007.
BOURDIEU, Pierre; WACQUANT, Loïc J. D. An invitation to reflexive sociology Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
CHILISA, Bagele. Indigenous research methodologies 2. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2012.
CHANG, Heewon; NGUNJIRI, Faith; HERNANDEZ, Kathy-Ann C. Collaborative autoethnography New York: Routledge, 2016.
CLARK, Tom. Gaining and maintaining access: exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers. Qualitative Social Work, v. 10, n. 4, p. 485-502, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325009358228
GALVEZ, Eliana; MUÑOZ, Susana M. (Re)Imagining anti-colonial notions of ethics in research and practice. Journal of College Student Development, v. 61, n. 6, p. 781-796, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2020.0075
GUILLEMIN, Marilys; GILLAM, Lynn. Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 10, n. 2, p. 261-280, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360
GUTA, Adrian; WILSON, Mark G.; FLICKER, Sarah; TRAVERS, Rob; MASON, Cathy; WENYEVE, George; O’CAMPO, Patricia. Are we asking the right questions? A review of Canadian REB practices in relation to community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, v. 5, p. 35-46, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.35
HEIMER, Carol A.; PETTY, Jody. Bureaucratic ethics: IRBs and the legal regulation of human subjects research. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 6, p. 601-626, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131454
JACOBSEN, Karen; LANDAU, Loren. The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, v. 27, n. 3, p. 185-206, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228
KATZ, Jack. Toward a Natural History of Ethical Censorship. Law & Society Review, v. 41, p. 797-810, 2007.
KHAN, Hafiz Khalid; HUSSAIN, Shahbaz; ALAM, Muhammad. Ethical considerations in social sciences: The dilemmas of informed consent. Research Journal of Social Sciences and Economics Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 189-195, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36902/rjsser-vol2-iss2-2021(189-195)
KOVACH, Margaret. Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009.
MACKENZIE, Catriona; MCDOWELL, Christopher; PITTAWAY, Eileen. Beyond “do no harm”: the challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, v. 20, n. 2, p. 299-319, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem008
MCILVEEN, Peter. Autoethnography as a method for reflexive research and practice in vocational psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, v. 17, n. 2, p. 13-20, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/103841620801700204
PERRY, Kristen H. Ethics, vulnerability, and speakers of other languages: how university IRBs (do not) speak to research involving refugee participants. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 17, p. 899-912, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411425006
SABATI, Sahar. Upholding “colonial unknowing” through the IRB: Reframing institutional research ethics. Qualitative Inquiry, v. 25, n. 9-10, p. 1056-1064, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418787214
SMITH, Linda Tuhiwai. Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. 2. ed. London: Zed Books, 1999.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Meray Sadek , Neela Hassan

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores/as conservarán plenos derechos de autor sobre su obra y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição BY , que permite a terceros la redistribución, con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
Los autores pueden autoarchivar sus manuscritos aceptados, publicarlos en blogs personales, repositorios institucionales y redes sociales académicas, así como publicarlos en sus redes sociales personales, siempre que se incluya la cita completa de la versión original de la revista.

