Cosmopolitan Shamelessness and the Ethics of Migration
A proposal for open moral borders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-85852503880006411Keywords:
Ethics of migration, open borders, moral skepticism, moral relativismAbstract
In this paper I clarify the nature of the most fundamental moral commitments that lie at the basis of contemporary discussions in ethics of migration, some of which are explicitly adopted by both supporters and critics of the open borders proposal. I argue that it is impossible to provide a rational justification for these principles themselves, but that this situation does not imply that moral relativism is a plausible position. Understanding the unique nature of our commitment to fundamental ethical values and principles (which I here call ‘fundamental-and-groundless’ principles) does not imply that moral relativism is a plausible position, but quite the opposite, namely that we should become aware that both moral relativism and moral skepticism are absurd positions. This result has consequences in the ethics of migration, in as much as it blocks any attempt at justifying anti-migrant positions which appeal to moral relativism.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição BY that allows the sharing of the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to to self-archive their published manuscripts by posting them in personal blogs, institutional repositories and scientific social media, as well as on their personal social media, as long as the full citation of the original publication is included.
